This one time, at band camp, Camm Maguire said: > > also not up to a maintainer to decide that an architecture should not be > > supported release wise... and if it would be there is a procedure to > > Not doing that, just saying I'm not going to adjust my packages for an > arch which cannot provide the basic facility to package maintainers to > support it. Human time is much more valuable than machine time, and > having to spend months of the former pursuing the latter is just > wrong.
If you're unwilling to support your packages on multiple platforms, I just don't know what to say. Perhaps you want to reconsider your commitment to Debian, but telling a Release Manager that you don't feel like doing your part is hardly an auspicious way to start on the path to becoming a developer. There are plenty of people who can provide access to arm machines to you, and there are plenty of emulators availale if you can't be bothered to find those people. Deciding that you don't care is really not an option. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
