Hi Thanks for the fast answer. > The patch does not apply cleanly (hunk #1 fails even if the filename is > changed to lib/paxnames.c ). > > Furthermore, a quick glance suggests to me that this code isn't actually > being used. Am I wrong? Just to clarify, from what I could see the pax code is compiled into the libcpio. Isn't the library used? The code does not have the new additional stuff from tar, but you might be right, if it is not used. Sorry for the short reply, once I finish my last exam, I will try to have a deeper look. But please feel free to tell me, if and why the code is not used, saves time :) Thanks for your efforts.
Cheers Steffen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
