On Sun, 04 Nov 2007, James Bromberger wrote: > Alexandre Pereira Nunes wrote: > > 2007/11/4, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > > > the switch has been made some time ago. > > you are the *first* to holler due to ethernet over firewire! > > > > Err. No. Not the first. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2007/10/msg00414.html
well is also against old 2.6.22, check out the other bug reports 2.6.23 has latest firewire trunk and bug reporters are happy. checkout 2.6.23 trunk snapshot builds -> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel > And I'll note that no one replied. Is the Debian-kernel list not the > right place to discuss the... Debian Kernel? what are you insinuating?! see discussions on #441206, #441179 and switch announcement Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I agree with Alexandre. Not a kernel bug; Juju is a DEVELOPMENT UNSTABLE > stack. (Though I see from the kernel build that even further patches > have been applied to the current SVN so maybe thats not so broken, > however that is NOT in unstable/testing...). no complete wrong perspective. the old stack had a numerous nr. of problem and is disabled due to security concerns. also userspace has to adapt itself to the new stack. fedora 7 released 1/2 a year ago with the new stack and so did fedora 8. i agree that the juju stack is not yet feature complete, but improved already quite a lot since 2.6.22 inclusion. if you want to contribute test latest and holler upstream if that is not working - like #435062 -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
