* Philipp Hug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20071104 15:01]: > > Ah, just noticed that there is a package named drbd8-source with a > > new upstream version fresh in the pool which fixes the issue.
> > Is there any specific reason why you didn't make drbd-module-source > > a virtual package depending on drbd8-source? > because drbd-module-source is provided by both drbd0.7-module-source and > drbd8-source. > where do you have dependency on drbd-modules-source? Because I always used just drbd8-module-source, AFAICS there's no upgrade path from drbd8-module-source to drbd8-source for people using drbd8-module-source only. regards, -mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
