What a useful link! gdb can be intimidating.  Sorry for the delay.. 18mb over
56k isn't real quick.  Anyway, here's the dump...

#0  0x402a8d26 in gtk_button_get_relief () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#1  0x40d311ea in smooth_draw_flat_box () from
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/li bsmooth.so
#2  0x403cbc2f in gtk_paint_flat_box () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#3  0x402fd700 in _gtk_entry_get_borders () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#4  0x4036e9fe in _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED () from
/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so .0
#5  0x406539c9 in g_cclosure_new_swap () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#6  0x40653736 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7  0x40664855 in g_signal_emit_by_name () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8  0x40663c8c in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9  0x40664126 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 0x4045de97 in gtk_widget_send_expose () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#11 0x4036c33d in gtk_main_do_event () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 0x405575d9 in gdk_window_clear_area_e () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 0x4055772e in gdk_window_process_all_updates () from
/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0 .so.0
#14 0x402e2c1e in gtk_container_set_reallocate_redraws () from
/usr/lib/libgtk-x 11-2.0.so.0
#15 0x406aa583 in g_child_watch_add () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#16 0x406a7582 in g_main_depth () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#17 0x406a85f8 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#18 0x406a8930 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#19 0x406a8b7d in g_main_context_iteration () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#20 0x4036be55 in gtk_main_iteration () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 0x0807760e in jam_run (doc=0x80e0590) at jam.c:831
#22 0x08058fe6 in run_gtk (doc=0x80e0590) at init.c:152
#23 0x080591a3 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff9e4) at init.c:227


On 4/26/05, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot reproduce this at all. Can you try to get a good backtrace from
> the crash? There are instructions for how to do so here:
> http://wiki.debian.net/?HowToGetABacktrace
> Just replace the "hello" package in the example with logjam.
> 
> JackLyn Crawford wrote:
> > Subject: logjam: Segfaults on startup
> > Package: logjam
> > Version: 4.4.1-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > Logjam segfaults when View->Entry Date is selected or when an
> > entry that has a date is loaded.  I had no problems during my
> > last entry on 4-20-05 but haven't been able to use it since.
> > The only change I am aware of is the gtk2 upgrade, but even
> > downgrading those libraries had no effect.
> >
> > I removed <datesel/> from the conf.xml and logjam will function,
> > just no dates and I can't load any past entries.
> >
> > Please help.  Logjam has become an important part of my life!! :)
> >
> > JackLyn
> >
>

Reply via email to