tags 306388 pending
thanks

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:16:28PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > could you send in the typical logline that matches aboves rules?
> 
> sure,
> Apr 25 22:54:35 sagara udhcpd[6749]: sending OFFER of 192.168.0.21            
>                 
> Apr 25 22:54:35 sagara udhcpd[6749]: sending ACK to 192.168.0.21             

thanks for your quick feedback.
added the attached 2 rules for initial udhcpd support to current
logcheck cvs, will be integrated in next release.
 
> > logcheck rules should all be terminated by '$' and
> > [.0-9]+ is i pressume an ip adress which is better narrowed to
> > [.0-9]{7,15}?
> 
> exactly, I copied the expression from existing lines in dhcp so I assumed it 
> was
> okay 
hmm looks more like an oversight, corrected also.

do not hesitate to report other bugs/logs which should be ignored.
> 

--
maks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to