Le jeudi 01 novembre 2007 à 07:38 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > Le mardi 30 octobre 2007 à 17:13 +0100, =?UTF-8?Q? Andr=C3=A9?= Heynatz
> > a écrit :

> >> Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
> >> [Switching to Thread 0xb6dd98c0 (LWP 15291)]
> >> 0xb7f74410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> >> (gdb) bt
> >> #0  0xb7f74410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> >> #1  0xb73f61c7 in syscall () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> >> #2  0xb7470823 in flistxattr () from /lib/libattr.so.1
> >> #3  0xb746fa7a in attr_copy_fd () from /lib/libattr.so.1
> >> #4  0x0807a18f in save_existing_local_file (lsaver=0x81b9ac0) at
> >> gedit-local-document-saver.c:435
> >> #5  0xb74a1936 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> >> #6  0x081b9ac0 in ?? ()
> >> #7  0xb7e2f8ac in __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt () from
> >> /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
> >> #8  0xb74a11c6 in g_main_context_dispatch () from
> >> /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> >> #9  0xb74a4552 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> >> #10 0x0811cb70 in ?? ()
> >> #11 0xffffff9c in ?? ()
> >> #12 0x0833c130 in ?? ()
> >> #13 0x00000000 in ?? ()
> >
> > This is an entirely different issue than that of the initial bug. It
> > looks like some libattr operation is hanging on CIFS filesystems.
> >
> > Nathan, what do you think? I'm tempted to reassign this to the kernel.
> 
> I tend to agree.  Is this on i386-based hardware?  Guess so as there's
> references
> to 486 and 686 in the gdb stack trace - in which case, this is a very
> commonly
> exercised code path - all distributions, all local filesystems would go
> through this
> code, so likely CIFS is involved.

Andre, could you please try again with a stock Debian kernel? Otherwise,
you can directly file a bug in the kernel.org bugzilla.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.
: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Reply via email to