Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Bug#443334: policy: postinst abort-remove state."):
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > After all the surprise is that the package became installed.
> > Redefining the postinst's semantics so that the package doesn't count
> > as installed in this case is the wrong answer - the right answer is
> > not to attempt to fix up the package in this case. If it was broken
> > beforehand then there's no reason why an aborted removal should try to
> > restore it to fully working state.
>
> Indeed! [...]
> Will you implement that change ?
Yes.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
