* Jan Smr???a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071031 02:28]:
> Wihout ghostscript-x package, there's nothing showed but cursor seems
> like the gv is still working. But it does nothing. Ghostscript output
> wasn't helpful at all.
Ugh, that looks like the ghostscript package broke the transition.
I'll clone this bug to ghostscript, it should not provide gs or gs-gpl
when not offering that package's features.
I'll upload a new gv package soon. Though I'm still undecided how to
work around ghostscript's brokeness. Ideally would be something like
Depends: ghostscript-x | gs-gpl | gs
I think problem with ghostscript providing gs-gpl can be circumvented
by making that dependency versioned, but how to still allow other
ghostscripts, the old gs was also a virtual package?
(I guess the only solution will be listing all gs-* packages (with
some version), it's not the nicest solution, but should work.)
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
