Hi, > By the way, a suggestion for the names of packages: is it possible > to change ghostscript-x to ghostscript, and rename ghostscript to > ghostscript-nox? This naming policy may be more consistent with > other debian packages. e.g., vim and vim-nox, emacs22 and > emacs22-nox, etc.
Thanks for suggestion, but the current ghostscript-x package only contains /usr/lib/ghostscript/8.61/X11.so, so I'm pretty much reluctant to call it the "main" ghostscript package. Possibly I should have called it ghostscript-plugin-x or such, but I don't think it makes much difference... Best regards, MH -- Masayuki Hatta Graduate School of Economics, The University of Tokyo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
