Hi,

The aim of this message was just to see if you were really interrested
in wx2.8.
I'm sorry to say this, but your activity on the BTS doesn't make me feel
there's something going on on wx2.8 packaging.
Many people are waiting on it, please consider this too.

I won't send such message again if you could tell us on the BTS what's
current state of wx2.8 packaging, and if possible an ETA.

All I want is improve Debian. Many people had to delay updated packages
because of missing wx2.8. I'm in this situation too, for a while, and I
don't understand why there's no activity on the BTS (people saying, "I
have a package ready", or "Building ubuntu package on lenny works fine"
and no response from you).

What's the problem with wx2.8 ? I understand it's a big and complicated
package, but I wx2.8 has been released several monthes ago!

Regards, Adam.

Ron a écrit :
> Er, Hi to you too Adam.
>
> As much as one might find it satisfying to reward such intense
> gratitude as you express here with further gifts of their time,
> I must point out that talk of hijacking from people who've never
> so much as bothered even asking what issues exist for Lenny,
> doesn't really make me want to climb on board their aeroplane...
>
> How about you rewind a little, and start with a plan that
> includes contacting the current maintainer with a rational
> attitude.
>
> I don't know what community you learned behaviour like this
> was appropriate in, but it won't get you very far in mine.
>
> If you actually want to help, that would be the shame.
>
> Sincerely,
> Ron
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:55:30PM +0100, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> Bastian Kleineidam, me and probably many others people have a working
>> package for wx2.8.
>> How long all packages maintainer will keep being stuck to and old
>> release of their software because of wx2.8 lack?
>>
>> Bastian, any plan to hijack current wx maintainer soon? It's a shame to
>> not have wx2.8 yet.
>>
>> Regards, Adam.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     



Reply via email to