On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:36:07PM +0300, Lasse Collin wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 12:11:31PM +0200, Géraud Meyer wrote: > > > Package: file > > > Version: 4.21-3 > > > > > > Any lzma compressed file I encountered is not recognized as LZMA > > > compressed data. An example: > > > > > > $ cat > test > > > Text file > > > $ lzma test > > > $ file test.lzma > > > test.lzma: data > > > > > > I also tested the version 4.20-3 (found here: > > > http://archive.daniel-baumann.ch/debian/packages/file/4.20-3/) that > > > was supposed to be fixed and it gives the same result. > > > > I recall they had plans to change the signature. CCing the lzma > > maintainers, maybe they know something.. > > The .lzma format currently in use is too hard to detect without looking > at the filename suffix. The new .lzma format will fix this and a few > other problems, but there are no stable tools to handle the new format > yet.
Wait, I'm lost now. Which version of the format was my patch targetted at, the old or the new one? Or there are 3 of them? :-) P.S: don't CC me, I'm the bug submitter -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
