Hello Jason, Le vendredi 31 août 2007 à 10:18 -0500, Jason Kraftcheck a écrit : > What I don't understand is why it is defined as anything other than > stlp_std. I couldn't find a Debian package with a library containing the > non-thread-safe functions. If the library isn't available, what good is > it to have the symbols in the headers? And why have the default in the > headers be something that isn't available in the corresponding library?
(sorry for the late reply. I thought I had sent this one) I think this is something that has to be discussed with upstream. In the past I tried, for another package[1], to honor a request similar to yours, but it turned ou to have unforeseen consequences[2]. So this is not something I'll do on my own. I'll discuss this with STLport upstreams. Regards, Thomas [1] http://bugs.debian.org/380739 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/420216
