On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 08:16:58PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Steve: > > > usershare = yes > > > usershare max shares = <integer> > > > > I'm not sure that we would want the share count to be unlimited by default > > either, though? > > Well, picking a number would be tricky. One that's suitable for Joe > might be completely incorrect for Barbara. >
If 'usershare max shares' would be set to a value by default, it would come back to almost the same situation as the proposed one. The only difference would be the possibility for the user to set the number of shares to unlimited (which would not be the default value). The number 100 in the original patch is just a random number. -- Mathias
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
