On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:45:42 -0700, Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] > run > /etc/init.d/nvidia-glx start Thanks, I'm not sure I'm interpreting this right. In my report I noted that nvidia-glx diverted /usr/lib/libGL.so to /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.xlibmesa, but the latter is missing: ,-----[ ls -al /usr/lib/nvidia ] | total 3980 | drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2007-09-30 06:13 . | drwxr-xr-x 202 root root 81920 2007-10-07 23:05 .. | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2523994 2007-09-29 16:13 libGLcore.so.xlibmesa | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 513928 2007-08-28 09:00 libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa | lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2007-08-28 20:19 libGL.so.1.xlibmesa -> libGL.so.1.2 | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 542394 2007-09-29 16:13 libglx.so.xlibmesa | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 127480 2007-09-22 19:22 libnvidia-cfg.so.100.14.19 | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3408 2007-09-22 19:22 libnvidia-tls.so.100.14.19 | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 222010 2007-09-29 16:13 libwfb.so.xserver-xorg-core | -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5064 2007-09-22 19:22 tls_test | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4920 2007-09-22 19:22 tls_test_dso.so `----- and also I see that libGL.so.1.xlibmesa points to a non-existent target (libGL.so.1.2). Am I missing something? I'm not sure either whether this is the root of the problem that prompted to send the report; namely that building some packages (CVS grass, a GIS) require libGL.so (which no longer exists with nvidia-glx) for compiling (though not at run time). I suppose there must be a bug either in nvidia-glx or CVS grass shouldn't be looking specifically for libGL.so and let libGL.so.1 take over it. Any thoughts? Thanks. -- Seb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
