On 15/10/07 at 10:02 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 01:10:37PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 15/10/07 at 12:30 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > > severity 446731 important
> > >
> > > Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > I use unionfs, but ran into the same problem with aufs.
> > >
> > > did you also adjust LH_LINUX_PACKAGES, not just LH_UNION_FILESYSTEM?
> >
> > I have:
> > LH_LINUX_PACKAGES="linux-image-2.6 unionfs-modules-2.6 squashfs-modules-2.6"
> Until Daniel makes the next upload, setting --union-filesystem aufs
> doesn't update LH_LINUX_PACKAGES; you need to manually pass
> --linux-packages 'linux-image-2.6 aufs-modules-2.6 squashfs-modulues-2.6'
Just for clarification, in case someone runs into this bug report:
it works if you set
LH_UNION_FILESYSTEM="aufs"
LH_LINUX_PACKAGES="linux-image-2.6 ${LH_UNION_FILESYSTEM}-modules-2.6
squashfs-modules-2.6"
Still, it would be much better if lh_build could fail, instead of
generating a broken image. Diffing the two logs, I could find this:
Couldn't find any package whose name or description matched
"unionfs-modules-2.6-486"
Why not stop in that case?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
