David Coe wrote: > I haven't had a chance yet to compare tcptraceroute's capabilities > with the new one > in the traceroute package; have you? If they're similar enough we > probably don't need both.
as of now (traceroute 2.0.9), the wrapper in traceroute for tcptraceroute is only for mapping different options; compared to the original tcptraceroute, it lacks some features, and it requires root permissions. however, the new traceroute implementation is still under development and not that mature yet; i'd recommend to keep tcptraceroute, future tells if the new traceroute will be a complete replacement. so, it would be nice if you could add the respecting alternatives. Regards, Daniel -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
