On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:36:09 +0200 gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 00:41:42 -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > I'm still seeing the same auto-detection errors with 2.075-1. > > I've played around a bit: > * The subfolders are claimed to have the same type as the "top" > folder. > * The "top" folder is detected correctly as type "mh" if it is not > empty, but as "mbox" if it contains no mails but only folders. I sometimes see what you see, but I sometimes get a whole sub-folder tree of spurious 'mbox' ids even when the top folder has messages. I'm racking my brains trying to find a distinguishing criterion. The same folders always give the same results. I'd send you a problem folder tree, but so far I've only been able to provoke the bogus results on private folders, such as those containing financial information :-/ > At the moment I'm not sure if this is the desired behaviour and/or if > can be improved; I guess auto-detection if _empty_ folders (as in: > containing no messages) is a bit difficult ... > > Cheers, > gregor Thanks for your help, Celejar -- mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
