Am Sonntag, den 27.05.2007, 16:09 +0200 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-27 14:43]:
>
> > Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 23:09 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> > > package octave2.9
> > > severity 420080 important
> > > merge 420079 420080
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Sorry for filing the duplicated bug report (Olafur beated me by 6
> > > minutes...). At least, there Thomas's comments and mine appear in the
> > > second one.
> >
> > I just realized that there is a rather huge side-effect. octave-headers
> > triggers the installation of quite a lot of -dev packages (fftw-dev,
> > gfortran, ...).
> >
> > I'm still in favor of merging the packages, though.
>
> We might also move pkg.m into octave2.9-headers and avoid the huge
> side-effect you mention above.
How about scheduling this for 2.9.15? I don't think we should change it
somewhere in between two Debian revisions.
Different topic: it seems
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420080#29
didn't make it to the list. Slow server or did we accidentally discard
it?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
