Quoting CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Would it be possible to modify this slightly to say that if a GROUP= > line is given in the configuration file then -n is implied and that is > used, otherwise make a new one? It seems to me to be slightly better > behaviour as it, at least to me, easily follows from the actual act of > setting a single, solid group.
I have mitigated feelings about a setting in the "configuration file" to change the default setting of the program switches. As such, your proposal is an interesting compromise, yes. However, I wouldn't like to introduce confusion in the use of the software.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
