also sprach Hanspeter Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.09.21.0853 +0100]: > It is a good thing to have rules that are as specific as possible. > But they should only be as specific as needed, don't you agree? > (or am I missing something here?) > > The rules above are unspecific (to some extent) because it is > their purpose to match to a lot of cases. So, there is really no > need to be more specific. If so, many more rules would be > necessary (which is again not helpful for logchecks performance).
I didn't make the submission rules, I just observed them. The only thing I can say is that performance is not something I worry about with logcheck, or I'd have long orphaned the package. :) -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
