On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:50:01PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > A first concern comes with the dedicated group name. Should we use > "smbshare" and then still advertise that obsolete acronym (SMB) which > is however known by nearly everybody? >
Another proposal is to use a group named fileshare, that could be used to define a list of users that are allowed to define shared directories on the network (via samba, nfs, ftp or any other protocol). -- Mathias
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
