Thanasis Kinias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (12/09/2007): > scripsit Miriam Ruiz: > > > Thanks for notifying this, but isn't serious maybe too much severity > > for just improper documentation? > > As I understand it, Serious is appropriate for policy violations; > breaking FHS is a pretty severe policy violation.
See Policy 12.3, which is clear on that topic. That's a *should*, not a *must*. > The bigger one, really, is putting configuration files under > /usr/share and not in /etc, as /usr must be able to be mounted > read-only. Is/Was that bugreport about documentation at the wrong place (bug title), about missing documentation (bug body), or about configuration files under /usr/share? > See my post to the Games Team list on the NMU I prepared for mentors > which takes care of this. You may want to leave some time to the maintainers to handle the bug reports they receive, although patches are welcome. I'm not sure many packages maintained by the Games Team need (0-day) NMU for non-RC bugs… Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
pgpShCiOCTXS3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
