On 13/09/07 02:06, maximilian attems wrote: > lenny will _not_ release with any of these versions. > and it is very much now on the time to push for such changes. > > also such regressions are expected in a new more powerful stack. > if both are available such regressions never get tracked, > see alsa and the old oss drivers.
Allright. Even though I'd argue that this bug is already being tracked (cfr my bug report to the kernel bugzilla), I understand that there might be other bugs and regressions lurking in there - ie. I shouldn't be pushing for my pet bug at the cost of testing for other bugs. It does mean however that nforce2 users will most likely not be testing the Debian/Lenny kernels. The trade-off is sacrificing a relatively small pool of nforce2 Debian kernel testers vs a large pool of Juju firewire testers. If those are mutually exclusive, then I agree with you - the new stack is more important. I was hoping it wasn't mutually exclusive through blacklisting or another system, but I also understand you don't want to introduce this complexity for a potentially temporary issue. I'm doubtful however that this regression will be fixed by the kernel guys before Lenny's release. If it's not, we might have this discussion again :). Anyway, I won't push for this, at least not until Lenny gets close. Kind regards, Mourad -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
