On Monday 10 September 2007 01:57:07 pm Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If you *really* want to file a release-critical bug about this > > somewhere, file it instead against dpkg for lack of multiarch support > > sufficient to allow obsoleting ia32-libs ...
if you *really* want to get your point across, don't forget to cc the
submitter...
but in any event, "lack of $feature to allow obsoleting $package" is not
really justification for allowing $package to remain in violation of policy.
also, i don't see how that rationale warrants lowering the severity
to "wishlist". afaik "important" is the designated severity for policy
violations that are not deemed to be rc. however i'm not going to get
into a severity pingpong over it.
sean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
