On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 07:17:01PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > > > The package relationship described above makes it much harder > > > for a user to just run apt-get install and have things work out of the > > > box without manually specifying a second run to end up with what they > > > really want. Do you really think that: > > > apt-get install clamav-daemon > > > apt-get install clamav-freshclam > > > apt-get remove clamav-data-bootstrap > > > > > > is an intuitive way to arrive at what you wanted in the first place? > > > > Uh, no, that would be: > > > > aptitude install --without-recommends clamav-daemon clamav-freshclam > > > > There is no second run. > > That's my point - that results in no database files on disk when clamd's > postinst is run, resulting in it failing to start.
Erm, surely people who purposely evade recommends can be expected to know how to handle such a situation? > That's not really acceptable to save a few megabytes of download on > dist-upgrade. Well, that would be on every upgrade, not just dist-upgrade. With the amount of security bugs that happen these days, that's a burden. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]