On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 07:17:01PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > The package relationship described above makes it much harder
> > > for a user to just run apt-get install and have things work out of the
> > > box without manually specifying a second run to end up with what they
> > > really want.  Do you really think that:
> > > apt-get install clamav-daemon
> > > apt-get install clamav-freshclam
> > > apt-get remove clamav-data-bootstrap
> > > 
> > > is an intuitive way to arrive at what you wanted in the first place?
> > 
> > Uh, no, that would be:
> > 
> > aptitude install --without-recommends clamav-daemon clamav-freshclam
> > 
> > There is no second run.
> 
> That's my point - that results in no database files on disk when clamd's
> postinst is run, resulting in it failing to start.

Erm, surely people who purposely evade recommends can be expected to know
how to handle such a situation?

> That's not really acceptable to save a few megabytes of download on
> dist-upgrade.

Well, that would be on every upgrade, not just dist-upgrade. With the amount
of security bugs that happen these days, that's a burden.

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to