On Thursday 30 August 2007, Mark Hymers wrote: > On Thu, 30, Aug, 2007 at 10:38:13AM +0200, Michail Bachmann spoke thus.. > > > The (not really) funny thing is, a part of bacula (the bacula-director) > > will be linked against libssl anyway since libpq depends on it. Now I can > > only hope you dont plan to remove postgresql support as well... > > That's a seperate issue.
So bacula-dir can use a library (libpq) which uses libssl, but cannot use libssl directly? Maybe we should just create a wrapper library around libssl and be done with all the problems... ;-) > Although you're correct that ldd output for > bacula-dir shows libssl, look at the DT_NEEDED section using > objdump -x bacula-dir | grep NEEDED > > Certainly when we took advice from the ftpmasters for freeradius, that's > what counted. Ah, OK. But this is a technical advice, how about the legal status? I've never used your package, but if you cant install it without installing libssl IMO that would qualify as a dependency. CU Micha
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
