Package: pyzor Severity: minor This package's descriptions mention things like "I decided to implement Pyzor with a new protocol and release the entire system as software libre" This does not sound very well for a package description, mostly because this is more the upstream author statement rather than the packager's one (even if upstream==maintainer). The use of first person in user interaction should anyway be discouraged.
I also advise against the use of "software libre" which is more Span(gl)ish than English. The correct term should be "Free Software" (capitalized or not). Anyway, the explanations about pyzor being FLOSS while Razor isn't probably do not pertain to the package's description which should focus on what the software is meant for (which the rest of the package description does pretty well, indeed). -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
