On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > As the person doing MIA, I note that the maintainer isn't even in the > MIA database. So apparantly nobody inquired about this before on QA or
Because dima isn't MIA per se, he is mostly MIA. From experience, Dima doesn't have time to deal with SASL unless something very weird happens, but he DOES show up from time to time. > Dima, please comment on this removal request; do you agree to have this > package removed? Dima, please reply soon. I did ask you a lot of time ago, and got no reply. Nobody from d-d or [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke up against removing old sasl, either. I am willing to help with new sasl, but we really, really have no good reasons I can see for keeping old SASL in Debian, and I am *not* willing to help to keep it secure. Heck, not even qmail uses old sasl anymore, so we don't even have that aggravating reason to keep it around anymore... Upstream has deprecated this old version of SASL more than 3 years ago. It is about time we let it rest in peace. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
