Sven Hoexter wrote: > Is that really needed? We'll compile for unstable and that will > result in a dependency on the 1.34 libs anyway because libboost-dev is 1.34 > in unstable. So there is no chance for the package to migrate to testing > without boost 1.34 anyway. > IMHO we don't have to care for cases which do not apply to the Debian > ecosystem directly. The patch should be integrated upstream if at all. I mean > they mostly use the boost libs from their own tarball.
But caring for backports doesn't hurt, either. -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
