Christopher J Peikert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wonder, though, whether alternatives should still be used, since kinit > and klist *could* be replaced by another package, or do we just cross > that bridge when we come to it?
Well, there is something concrete to talk about, namely that it would be occasionally useful if one could install both krb5-user and heimdal-clients on the same system. That would mean using alternatives for all of kdestroy, kinit, klist, kpasswd, ksu, kadmin, and ktutil, as well as their man pages. Doable, although that's a lot of alternatives. My guess is that Heimdal and MIT should use the same priorities for all the programs except ksu, where the MIT version is setuid root and probably should be preferred. Sam, what do you think of this idea? I can talk to the Heimdal maintainer float the idea if you think it's a valid one. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
