Hello, Thanks for your report and investigation.
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007, Alexander Wuerstlein wrote: > An upgrade from sarge does not seem to be the real problem but having tetex > installed is, at least in my case. > > After 'apt-get install texlive' (which also removes tetex) it just works[tm]. > So perhaps tex4ht should depend on texlive. The problem seems to be due to some mixture of "tetex" and "texlive" packages. Could you tell me what combination caused problems so that I can introduce the appropriate "Conflicts"? I seem to recall having a perfectly working version of "tex4ht" when my system had only "tetex" and no "texlive" packages at all. By the way, the file "90tex4ht.cnf" file (under /etc/texmf/texmf.d) is due to become "80tex4ht.cnf" in order to be used with texlive (see #428044). Since this file provides file locations for tex it could perhaps also be "blamed" for *this* bug. Regards, Kapil. --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
