Hello Nicolas,
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 12:48:41AM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:15:33PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > 
> > I just updated the man page for goobox (yet unrelease, but I can
> > provide you the current copy) and decided to try out po4a. I read
> > po4a(7) and followed the steps (actually, right now only the first
> > step):
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/prog/debian/goobox/manpages$ po4a-gettextize -f sgml -m 
> > goobox.en.sgml -p goobox.en.pot
> > po4a::sgml: Warning: nsgmls is missing or non-functional.  Please make sure 
> > that
> >             nsgmls is present and does not produce any error (with the
> >             -wno-valid option), and report a bug otherwise.  Continuing...
> 
> I agree that this warning is annoying, and it is also misleading.
> 
> I intended to get rid of nsgmls, and replace it by an internal parser
> (e.g. using the Xml module), but it is more complicated than expected, so
> this warning remained, and the cases where po4a produced broken files were
> fixed.

At least in 0.31-1 bug #280882 is (unfortunately) still present. Since
the output is different for 0.29-1 and 0.31-1 I now think of
postprocessing the generated file with perl.

> I will remove the warning, and I will use the following warning in verbose
> mode only:
> 
>         nsgmls produced some errors.  This is usually caused by po4a, which
>         modifies the input and restores it afterwards, causing the input
>         of nsgmls to be invalid.  This is usually safe, but you may wish
>         to verify the generated document with nsgmls -wno-valid.
>         Continuing...

Fine with me. Looking forward for the fix.

Greetings

            Helge
-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to