On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 03:08:56AM +0200, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like I forgot to answer that mail: > > Mike Hommey, le Sun 08 Apr 2007 12:56:09 +0200, a écrit : > > Now that etch is released, I took a look again at your patch, and don't > > really understand why your fix is different for different parts of the > > code, why is not defining MAXPATHLEN and PATH_MAX to 1024 everywhere > > enough ? In which case, defining them in the appropriate header would > > make it work with only one patch... > > Well, why not, but it's a bit sad that there is such hard limit on the > lenght of filenames while the code could be made lengh-unbound.
Well, half of the patch was about adding macros for MAXPATHLEN and PATH_MAX... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
