Am 2007-07-28 14:31:52, schrieb David Moreno Garza: > Well, not exactly. I think we could rethink the concept of munging. For > example, it could be healthy to make all addresses shown on listarchives > to show as someuser at somedomain dot com, and that's it. We could > prevent some email addresses collecting, probably. > > However, bugs.debian.org should be a different way to handle it, since > lists and bugs are different things so far. > > Any listarchives expert around?
For the PUBLIC List-Archives the only way would be, IF the shown E-Mail
addresses would be transformed into a "href" and the person, which want
to respond to an archived message nust Emter it in a Webform located
on <lists.debian.org>.
This would defintiv prevent spambots graping the E-Mails from the archive
Another possibility would be, IF ALL E-Mails (including the sended one)
would be munged by <lists.debian.org> to point to dynamic pseudo E-Mails
which go through a seperated Debian Server which try to filter the SPAM
I think, the number incoming Messages is nor realy high, since I receive
over <debian-user-german> arround 60-150 message per day, which mean, it
would be environement 8000 Messages per day or all 10 seconds one. This
traffic can even be handled by an old HP Vectra XA5/200MMT (P1/200MHz/192MB)
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
