Package: labplot
Version: 1.5.1.6-1
Severity: minor

Several clarifications seem to be needed with respect to the license 
seem to be needed in the copyright file.

1) First, the NetCDF license listed states:

        Further, UCAR requests that the user credit UCAR/Unidata in any 
publications that result from the use of this software or in any product 
that includes this software.

If this is read as an obligation, it would be a BSD-like advertising 
clause that would conflict with the GPL.   However, the upstream NetCDF 
authors have clarified the license to read 
(http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/copyright.html):

        Further, UCAR requests that the user credit UCAR/Unidata in any 
publications that result from the use of this software or in any product 
that includes this software, although this is not an obligation.

I would recommend updating the netCDF code (and license statement) to 
a recent upstream version, to remove any doubt about the GPL 
compatibility.

2) Second, several files do not seem to be GPL-licensed, and their legal 
status is unclear.  

audiofile/extended.c is listed as "Copyright (C) 1988-1991 Apple 
Computer, Inc.  All rights reserved." with no further permissions.  This 
file looks dangerously non-free.

audiofile/g711.c is "a product of Sun Microsystems, Inc. and is provided 
for unrestricted use.  Users may copy or modify this source code without 
charge."  Unfortunately, this is quite a sloppy legal license, and does 
not explicitly grant the right to *sell* the software (required to be 
DFSG-free) and not just "use" it.

3) Although the copyright file lists the code as GPL version 2 only, I 
can find no such restriction in the source code.  I can't find a single 
file that lists the copyright as being version 2 only...the files that 
mention the GPL all list the copyright as being version 2 or later.  

The cephes/COPYING file lists version 2 only, but that seems to have 
been added by the Debian maintainers, since the authors' permission 
email (in the debian/copyright file) does not specify a particular 
version.

If the code is v2 or later, as opposed to v2-only, the debian/copyright 
file needs to say so.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.33-vpsX (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to