On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:18:31AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > Package: openocd > Version: 0.0+r184-1 > Severity: wishlist > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: eabi > > In previous version openocd did not have any archs specified. Now it > has, and armel has been dropped. In previous versions openocd > compiled fine, so please add it back.
Oops, sorry. Will re-add it in the next upload. > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:50:22AM +0300, Source Builder wrote: > > Automatic build of openocd_0.0+r184-1 on all6500-2 by sbuild/armel 0.53 > > Build started at 20070727-0150 > > ****************************************************************************** > > Checking available source versions... > > Fetching source files... > > Reading package lists... > > Building dependency tree... > > Need to get 292kB of source archives. > > Get:1 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main openocd 0.0+r184-1 (dsc) [748B] > > Get:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main openocd 0.0+r184-1 (tar) [288kB] > > Get:3 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main openocd 0.0+r184-1 (diff) [2789B] > > Fetched 292kB in 0s (470kB/s) > > Download complete and in download only mode > > openocd_0.0+r184-1: armel not in arch list: alpha amd64 arm armeb hppa > > hurd-i386 i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 m32r m68k mips mipsel > > netbsd-alpha netbsd-i386 powerpc sh sparc -- skipping I grabbed this list from http://buildd.net/cgi/archvote.phtml where armel is not listed (should this be fixed?). Is there any "official" list of current and possible future architectures I can use? Thanks, Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature