On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:18:31AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Package: openocd
> Version: 0.0+r184-1
> Severity: wishlist
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: eabi
> 
> In previous version openocd did not have any archs specified. Now it
> has, and armel has been dropped. In previous versions openocd
> compiled fine, so please add it back.

Oops, sorry. Will re-add it in the next upload.


> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:50:22AM +0300, Source Builder wrote:
> > Automatic build of openocd_0.0+r184-1 on all6500-2 by sbuild/armel 0.53
> > Build started at 20070727-0150
> > ******************************************************************************
> > Checking available source versions...
> > Fetching source files...
> > Reading package lists...
> > Building dependency tree...
> > Need to get 292kB of source archives.
> > Get:1 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main openocd 0.0+r184-1 (dsc) [748B]
> > Get:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main openocd 0.0+r184-1 (tar) [288kB]
> > Get:3 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main openocd 0.0+r184-1 (diff) [2789B]
> > Fetched 292kB in 0s (470kB/s)
> > Download complete and in download only mode
> > openocd_0.0+r184-1: armel not in arch list: alpha amd64 arm armeb hppa 
> > hurd-i386 i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 m32r m68k mips mipsel 
> > netbsd-alpha netbsd-i386 powerpc sh sparc -- skipping

I grabbed this list from http://buildd.net/cgi/archvote.phtml where
armel is not listed (should this be fixed?).

Is there any "official" list of current and possible future
architectures I can use?


Thanks, Uwe.
-- 
http://www.hermann-uwe.de  | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to