On Apr 15, Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (2) It would seem a shame to conflict with exim 3.x for such a minor > matter. How about, on clean install of mutt, doing something The exim maintainers could have fixed this stupid little details in all these years, it's not like this is my fault...
> in the postinst like: > > exim=$(dpkg -l exim | tail -n 1 | cut -c 1) > if [ "$exim" = i ]; then > # mangle /etc/Muttrc to unset write_bcc > fi Policy violation. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
