also sprach Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.22.1356 +0200]:
> I'm sure you're aware of yesterday's discussion on -devel.

I was not. I do not read -devel, and I did search the BTS, but
I would have expected it to mention script or something.

> I'm merging it with 422085 and downgrading it to wishlist, since
> it is a feature request, namely implementing a feature of another
> bugreport tool.

I disagree. bug-buddy/reportbug/bug all use /usr/share/bug, so it
can be considered standard. You're entering a new contender into the
field, so please try to stay compatible.

Reading the bug log of #422085, I can see that all the important
arguments have already been raised.

I also have had bug reports without the info from the bugscripts
that I wrote; do you want me to write back: "usually these data
would be provided, but since you use reportbug-ng, I just lost time
and so did you, so please run the bugscript manually now and
consider using something else than reportbug-ng?"

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply via email to