On 2007-07-20 08:31:03 +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > The copy of POSIX.1-2001 I am looking at is littered with the use of terms > like: > > NULL > NULL pointer > non-NULL > a NULL pointer > non-NULL value > if ... is [not] NULL > > and so on. So one of us is confused by your last point; at the > moment, I think it is you ;-).
No, this seems to have been fixed in the 2004 edition of POSIX (Issue 6). See http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/utimes.html It only uses the term "null pointer". Since it is the standard wording, the man pages should be fixed too. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
