* Sergio Gelato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070719 19:26]: > * Bernhard R. Link [2007-07-19 16:09:21 +0200]: > > Can you still see this bug? Could you send a backtrace where the write > > you speak about is called? > > Yes, I can reproduce the bug under sarge with the 3.6.1-10sarge2 version. > I can't reproduce the crash under etch. (There is only a milder problem, > that gv and evince --- but NOT gs -sDEVICE=x11 --- fail to display most > of the text on that page; but that may only signal a bug in that PostScript > file, most probably in the figure on that page.)
My etch gv seems to show everything on that page. I'm assuming this is still the same problem though a milder incarnation as in sarge. What does gs on etch with the options for antialiasing show? > I now see (from strace output) that gs dies with SIGSEGV just before its > parent gv receives the SIGPIPE. Running gs under gdb, then, with the > same arguments gv is using (-sDEVICE=x11 -dTextAlphaBits=4 > -dGraphicsAlphaBits=2 -dMaxBitmap=10000000 -dNOPLATFONTS -dNOPAUSE > -dQUIET -dSAFER) results in: > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x080d7aa3 in jpeg_mem_term () This very much looks like the cause and like a bug in gs-gpl, thus I've just reassigned this bug to the gs-gpl package. Hochachtungsvoll, Bernhard R. Link -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]