On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:42:03 -0700, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Regardless, even requiring debian/rules to be a makefile doesn't
> actually do much, because someone could do something like:
> .DEFAULT:
> debian/irule $@
> or whatever.
I actually see this as a argument for not changing the rule,
since using a Makefile does not in any way add restrictions for the
developer. debian/rules has been a makefile forever, allowing it to be
anything else doesn't buy anything practical, just a little geek value
for useless packages like shoop.
Saying that the ./debian/rules files is a Makefile is not
stating what language that rules have to be written in, since the
actual rules can be in any language whatsoever, and indeed, debhelper
is an example of how tools can still intercede in the build process,
and hide some of the complexities from the user (cf. the one line cdbs
rules makefile). But stating it is a makefile adds in all kinds of
affiliated baggage that the developer can then depend on; for example,
the semantics of:
"make -f ./debian/rules -j0 clean build binary" is another example of
are clear.
There's nothing you can do with a non-makefile executable that you
can't just as easily do by invoking that executable from the makefile,
and this other executable will never be able to emulate all of make's
behaviour.
I think I must object to this, on the grounds that we are now
changing an published interface to the package building process.
Indeed, I have used makefiles that include ./debian/rules and derive
targets and tweak the make rules in the debian/rules process
(security related experiments), and I would strongly object to the
mechanisms being yanked out from under me. make -n -p -d also allows a
level of debugging detail that is not readily available otherwise.
If there is a technical reason (apart from, ooh, I hate make)
for allowing ./debian/rules not to be a makefile, I'll be happy to
listen. What exactly is being prevented from having ./debian/rules a
Makefile?
manoj
--
You recoil from the crude; you tend naturally toward the exquisite.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
