Hi Sven. Sven Arvidsson, 15.07.2007 21:39: > On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 21:22 +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote: >> Here they are: >> >>> ii libpoppler-glib1 0.5.4-6 >>> PDF rendering library (GLib-based shared libr >>> ii libpoppler0c2 0.4.5-5.1 >>> PDF rendering library >>> ii libpoppler0c2-glib 0.4.5-5.1 >>> PDF rendering library (GLib-based shared libr >>> ii libpoppler0c2-qt 0.4.5-5.1 >>> PDF rendering library (Qt-based shared librar >>> ii libpoppler1 0.5.4-6 >>> PDF rendering library > > My setup looks a little bit different, > > ii libpoppler-dev 0.5.4-6 PDF > rendering library -- development files > ii libpoppler-glib-dev 0.5.4-6 PDF > rendering library -- development files ( > ii libpoppler-glib1 0.5.4-6 PDF > rendering library (GLib-based shared lib > ii libpoppler1 0.5.4-6 PDF > rendering library > ii poppler-utils 0.5.4-6 PDF > utilitites (based on libpoppler) > > I don't know if libpoppler0c2 can cause this, but I noticed some similar > peculiarities in #430452. In that bug, upgrading libpoppler0c2 to > 0.5.0-1 helped.
Uhm, how? There is no such version: > # apt-cache policy libpoppler0c2 > libpoppler0c2: > Installed: 0.4.5-5.1 > Candidate: 0.4.5-5.1 > Version table: > *** 0.4.5-5.1 0 > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status It's obvious that even the currently installed version should not exist anymore. After upgrading GIMP to version 2.3.18 from Experimental I was able to remove all libpoppler0c2* packages including pdfkit* packages as a back dependency. However, still no difference. Regards, Mathias -- debian/rules
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
