On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 05:48:25PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > > In various discussions prior to the reintroduction of bug archiving, the > > release team expressed the view that bugs of release-critical severity > > should not be archived until they have explicitly fixed in stable (according > > to version-tracking), or have been explicitly marked as not applying to > > stable (with suite tags).
> There's currently no way to indicate that a bug explicitely doesn't > apply to stable. Yes, there is: tags + lenny sid, or tags + lenny, or tags + oldstable experimental, or... > What should be done is the opposite; RC bugs which should not be > archived should be tagged etch, which will cause them not to be > archived. This gives the wrong default behavior, and relies on someone recognizing the bug and tagging it within a month of the closure for unstable. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
