Emanuele Rocca wrote: > I'm not much into X internals, but after a quick grep for Xinerama on > -video-ati and -video-sunffb it seems to me that the latter doesn't > provide useful replies to Xinerama related requests like > X_XineramaIsActive, while the former does. >
Indeed. > Somehow libxinerama assumes that XineramaIsActive even if sunffb doesn't > handle such request? > libxinerama didn't change much recently. While xserver-xorg-core changed a lot. I guess downgrading xserver-xorg-core to Etch would fix the problem. I would vote for the server reporting Xinerama as enabled even if the driver does not support it. It might be related to Xinerama now being implemented on top the Randr-1.2 extensions (since xserver-xorg-core 1.3). Unfortunately, only the intel driver supports Randr-1.2 so far. Maybe the server assumes something different. Anyway, I'll forward this bug upstream soon. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
