Brice Goglin a écrit :
BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Yes, I have.
Configuration : SS20 with dual SM71, 2.6.22-rc7 smp kernel (with
only one SMP related bug on sparc32 ;-) ), CG14 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
debian/testing up to date.
1/ X works fine (but I have to add /dev/tty0 in udev configuration
script because udev does'nt create tty0 !) with xfs ;
2/ gdm does not run (same bug than sparc64, XineramaIsActive
always returns True even if Xinerama is not active).
So, if I understand correctly, #399862 can be closed
Yes, #399862 can be closed. I have token some time to test because 2.6
kernels are not stable on sparc32 (even without SMP due to a lack in ESP
SCSI driver)...
while #431746
occurs on multiple machines?
I have tested some configurations to isolate parameters :
1/ sparc32/smp SS20 + CG14 -> bug (I haven't tested with CG6 because my
test workstation has no empty Sbus). I have a ZX framebuffer (leo) in a
SS5, but ZX framebuffer support is totaly broken in 2.6.x kernels;
2/ sparc64/smp U60 (UPA/PCI) + Creator3D -> bug;
3/ sparc64/smp U2 (UPA/Sbus) + Creator3D -> bug;
4/ i386 + prosavage8 -> no bug;
5/ i386 + Radeon Mobility 9200 (AGP) -> no bug.
All configurations are up to date (debian testing).
I don't know if this bug is sparc32/64 specific, but I only see this
bug on sparc32 and sparc64, never on i386.
Regards,
JKB
