On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:32:46PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > So thanks for the hint. Will go into QL 0.9.0 whenever it comes, or an > earlier bugfix if needed.
> Now, while I have your undivided attention: shall we block some arches from > building QL? I see it using vast compiler resources during builds (all those > C++ templates) and it is just not meant for 'small' systems (for various > definitions of small). Any thoughts? Well, libraries like quantlib might end up somewhere low in the build-dependency chain, where some actually usefull-on-slow-cpu app needs QL to to build. For example something like gnucash. The other problem is that ftp-masters and release maintainers measure archs by "how much of the archive is built and up-to-date on the arch". So, I don't think blocking slow packages like QL from building is a good idea. Just be careful when uploading, make sure that there is not stupid mistakes which would cause to reupload immeadetly. -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
