On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 05:32:53PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > If anyone other than Sven comes up with a good use for a libstdc++ > udeb, despite the problems described by others here, then I would like > people to give it all due consideration. If the situation changes I'm > sure that the d-i team and if necessary the committee are capable of > changing their minds.
Could someone assert why "dependency of a potential partimage udeb" is not a "good use"? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
