On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 05:15:10PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:27:41PM +0100, Kaare Hviid wrote: > > diff -Naur apg-2.2.3.dfsg.1/sha/sha.c apg-2.2.3.dfsg.1.fixed/sha/sha.c > > --- apg-2.2.3.dfsg.1/sha/sha.c 2003-08-07 17:40:30.000000000 +0200 > > +++ apg-2.2.3.dfsg.1.fixed/sha/sha.c 2007-03-19 11:45:03.122049745 > > +0100 > > I have applied your patch and uploaded to unstable. I really > appreciate your help.
Btw, I'm not sure if I communicated this to you - it was a while ago - I did test on big endian PPC, and although the SHA-1 algorithm as such probably isn't correct on big endian machines, it appears to have no effect on the quality of the PRNG - the passwords appeared to be properly rondomized. That is, I don't think the #define APG_LITTLE_ENDIAN in sha/sha.h I raised concern about matters for apg. -ukh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
