On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:22:03 +0200 Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Considering the number of users, I think it might be a good idea > anyway, but I just want to make sure you understand the consequences > -- if I'd remove it now, there will be no sylpheed gtk2-enabled > version in unstable (and later testing) until sylpheed's updated. > i asked you to remove sylpheed-gtk2 because sylpheed (1.9.7) has the same code of sylpheed-gtk2 and because it is no more maintained upstream. atm is not useful (imo) for sarge. do it :) thank you -- ciao giskard spero nel ritorno del grande bastardo.
pgpKj8tt99yYh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
